![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Filesystem features
May. 29th, 2008 11:27 amCheck out the last column... The humor of some wikipedians...
I'm still using reiserfs for all of my important storage needs. With Namesys sort of crumbling, I'm wondering if I should switch to something else. I suppose reiserfs hasn't really changed in ages, so there's no real reason a lack of active development should affect me. I still maintain that reiserfs is great and reiser4 was visionary and had an incredible potential... but Hans was just so blindly defensive. He felt that most complaints about reiser4's integration into the kernel came from people's anger over how amazing a filesystem it was... He was clearly right and others were just out to get him.
I'm still using reiserfs for all of my important storage needs. With Namesys sort of crumbling, I'm wondering if I should switch to something else. I suppose reiserfs hasn't really changed in ages, so there's no real reason a lack of active development should affect me. I still maintain that reiserfs is great and reiser4 was visionary and had an incredible potential... but Hans was just so blindly defensive. He felt that most complaints about reiser4's integration into the kernel came from people's anger over how amazing a filesystem it was... He was clearly right and others were just out to get him.
